It defines the hold as placing a person in a way that compresses their airway and reduces their ability to breathe. That includes putting body weight on a restrained person’s neck, torso, or back.
The California State Sheriffs’ Association said the bill is too broad “and neglects situations in which a subject creates a threat of death or serious bodily injury to an officer or another person.” Barring the holds by trained officers makes it more likely they will have to use alternatives like batons or Tasers, the association said.
Nevada enacted a similar ban last year as part of broader legislation, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Many law enforcement agencies already restrict the practice. Police manuals warn that restraining someone face down for an extended period can lead to injuries or death.
Gipson’s legislation gained attention after 26-year-old Mario Gonzalez died in April. He was pinned down by four Alameda Police Department employees for more than five minutes before he died. About the same time, a jury in Southern California awarded more than $2 million to the family of a homeless man who died in 2018 after officers in Anaheim used a similar technique to restrain him.