Cryptocurrency has recently exploded in the mainstream and we’re seeing unprecedented adoption. Gaining the attention of prominent influencers like Elon Musk, Mark Cuban and Tom Brady, and with institutional investors slowly warming to the idea of cryptocurrency as a true asset class, digital currencies are here to stay. While government bodies look to enact guardrails to protect the everyday investor from bad actors, generally speaking, cryptocurrency has grown into a flexible and accessible means to invest and transact globally.
These developments underscore cryptocurrency’s momentum, but just as importantly, they show how fintech platforms that utilize cryptocurrencies, like PayPal and Kraken, are now integrated into the financial services sector. This increased integration further emphasizes the need for the government to treat cryptocurrency as critical infrastructure.
What is critical infrastructure anyway?
Critical infrastructure is an official designation the U.S. government bestows to specific “critical” sectors that, while mostly run by private companies, are so vital to society’s functioning that the government must take a special interest in ensuring they remain safe from attacks or other vulnerabilities. The U.S. government works with leaders in these industries to share best practices around security and risk management, collaborate to address threats, and discuss policies relevant to the sector’s continued safety. The 16 sectors designated as critical infrastructure include communications, health care, energy and, most relevant to cryptocurrency, financial services.
Why cryptocurrency should be included in critical infrastructure discussions
The financial services sector is comprised of companies that allow customers to deposit funds, make payments, access credit or invest, and is overseen by the Department of the Treasury who manages the day-to-day needs of the sector regarding critical infrastructure. Cryptocurrency businesses, like exchanges, merchant services providers, various DeFi platforms, and others, fill all those same financial services roles, just with cryptocurrency rather than fiat.
Still, cryptocurrency purchasing continues to increase, particularly amongst institutional investors seeking new safe-haven assets. Not only that, but the cryptocurrency ecosystem faces unique threats that warrant special attention from the government. Due to its pseudonymous nature, cybercriminals have embraced cryptocurrency as a tool for illicit transactions and money laundering, including some linked to North Korea and Al-Qaeda. Cryptocurrency businesses also face unique challenges from hackers seeking to steal funds, which threatens not only the businesses themselves, but also the finances of their users.
While cryptocurrency may represent only a small part of the financial services sector, its rapid, ongoing growth, unique concerns, and recent move into the traditional banking arena, show how cryptocurrencies have evolved from a fringe technology into a critical component of the financial system that requires the attention of the U.S. government.
What it would mean for Treasury and the U.S. government
Treasury’s critical infrastructure activities, as the sector-specific agency (SSA) responsible for the financial services sector, are designed to enhance the security and resilience of the financial services sector while reducing operational risk. They coordinate, on behalf of the U.S. government, activities to ensure the integrity of the financial services sector. These include relationships with sector partners that allow Treasury unique insights to how the sector operates. This information in turn gives the U.S. government the ability to allocate the necessary resources in order best protect the sector.
By including cryptocurrency companies in their critical infrastructure discussions, Treasury – therefore the U.S. government – would exponentially increase their operational understanding of the current cryptocurrency landscape. This is important as it would allow Treasury to create the most up-to-date and accurate picture of the financial sector, giving the U.S. government the awareness it needs to reallocate resources to better protect and defend the sector, ultimately strengthening U.S. national security.
Benefits for sector partners
At the very least, even financial institutions who remain hesitant will benefit from cryptocurrency’s inclusion in critical infrastructure discussions by learning more about the industry’s security and risk management best practices, even if they ultimately don’t decide to get involved. In return, cryptocurrency leaders can share what they’ve learned about security and risk management in their uniquely innovative field, which could lead to valuable insights for both their counterparts in the fiat world and their partners in government. In this way, adding cryptocurrency to critical infrastructure would be a win-win.
Eventually, we’ll likely see that cryptocurrency’s critical infrastructure status goes beyond financial services. Many see cryptocurrency as the driving force behind Web 3.0, which they view as an upcoming shift towards a more decentralized internet with greater privacy and power for individual users. In this new paradigm, cryptocurrency and its related technologies will power businesses that overlap with other critical infrastructure sectors. So while cryptocurrency is currently having its greatest impact in financial services, it’s easy to see how it could soon play a role in other pieces of critical infrastructure, which is all the more reason to include it now.
Don Spies is the director of strategic initiatives for Chainalysis.