David Snell - Federal News Network

Listen Live

healthcare premium

Federal Report

2019 health premiums: Disappointing selfies

Health insurance experts say that in four or five years there would be little or no difference in the family and self-plus one plans.

Federal Report

Trump budget kicks his fed voter base: cops & firefighters

Federal Report

Joys and sorrows of turning 65 — Medicare Part B

Open Season

5 reasons why you should change your health plan during Open Season

Retirement

OPM Retirement Services has 1 customer service rep for every 27K annuitants

Mike Causey

What happens if your health plan leaves you?

Benefits

Record-setting Open Season prompts limited enrollment period

Young couples without children and older couples whose kids have flown the coop are disappointed again with the new 2019 premiums for their favorite health plan.

Both age groups flocked to the new self-plus-one option when it was first approved hoping to save the much bigger bucks charged by self-plus family plans. Instead, there would be little to no different between a selfie and a family plan — as the experts predicted.

Next year, the popular <strong>Blue Cross-Blue Shield</strong> standard self-plus-one plan (covering up to two people) will have a biweekly premium of $256.54, while the self-plus family option, which could cover a dozen or more family members, will charge $268.21 in premiums. While that is a welcome if slight drop in premiums, the plans charged this year ($1.27 less for the self plan, $3.74 less for the family plan) it is not what many people expected.

Blue Cross' basic plan next year will charge $170.57 biweekly for its self-plus-one plan and $177.24 for those who need its family plan. The government share of the total premium will rise to $525.32 for the family plan and $492.27 for the selfie.

So why are folks in the Brady Bunch (larger family) category paying almost the same as those in a plan covering only a couple and one child? Short answer: Usage.

For decades feds — young and old — demanded that Congress give them a plan (self-plus-one) in addition to the self-only and family plans. They argued it was unfair for a couple, often very young or very old, to have to pay the same premiums as a household with lots of kids. But experts disagreed.

They said that once people got used to having three options, a larger number of older workers and retirees — known in the trade as “heavy users” because of their age-related health issues — would migrate to the self-plus-one options and that they would have to re-adjust rates upward.

<strong>David Snell</strong>, former benefits director for the National Active and Retired Federal Employees and a former official at the Office of Personnel Management, said that in four or five years there would be little or no difference in the family and self-plus one plans.

Some experts say that as more older workers and retirees move into self-plus-one plans, the day could come when they will pay slightly higher premiums than those paid by the bigger, but younger and healthier people in family plans.

For a look at all the premium changes in all of the nationwide fee-for-service plans covering most non-postal workers and retirees, — and you can compare rates for 2018 and 2019 as well as look at the self-only, family and self-plus one plan premiums — take a look at the charts released by the Office of Management and Budget: <a href="https://federalnewsradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Non-Postal-Premium-Rates.pdf">Non-Postal Premium Rates Charts.</a>
<h2>Nearly Useless Factoid</h2>
<strong>By <a href="mailto:sthomas@federalnewsradio.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Steff Thomas</a></strong>

In 1883, the City of New York passed a Tariff Act that placed a special tax on imported vegetables. The John Nix & Co. company filed a lawsuit against Edward Hedden, a collector on the port of New York, to recover back-taxes paid under protest. The suit went all the way to the Supreme Court. It was in the Supreme Court hearing <i>Nix v. Hedden </i>that the tomato was re-classified as a vegetable, and not a fruit.

<i>Source: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_v._Hedden" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Wikipedia</a></i>

Your Turn

Is the new self-plus-one option right for you?

Mike Causey

The morning after: now what?

Young couples without children and older couples whose kids have flown the coop are disappointed again with the new 2019 premiums for their favorite health plan.

Both age groups flocked to the new self-plus-one option when it was first approved hoping to save the much bigger bucks charged by self-plus family plans. Instead, there would be little to no different between a selfie and a family plan — as the experts predicted.

Next year, the popular <strong>Blue Cross-Blue Shield</strong> standard self-plus-one plan (covering up to two people) will have a biweekly premium of $256.54, while the self-plus family option, which could cover a dozen or more family members, will charge $268.21 in premiums. While that is a welcome if slight drop in premiums, the plans charged this year ($1.27 less for the self plan, $3.74 less for the family plan) it is not what many people expected.

Blue Cross' basic plan next year will charge $170.57 biweekly for its self-plus-one plan and $177.24 for those who need its family plan. The government share of the total premium will rise to $525.32 for the family plan and $492.27 for the selfie.

So why are folks in the Brady Bunch (larger family) category paying almost the same as those in a plan covering only a couple and one child? Short answer: Usage.

For decades feds — young and old — demanded that Congress give them a plan (self-plus-one) in addition to the self-only and family plans. They argued it was unfair for a couple, often very young or very old, to have to pay the same premiums as a household with lots of kids. But experts disagreed.

They said that once people got used to having three options, a larger number of older workers and retirees — known in the trade as “heavy users” because of their age-related health issues — would migrate to the self-plus-one options and that they would have to re-adjust rates upward.

<strong>David Snell</strong>, former benefits director for the National Active and Retired Federal Employees and a former official at the Office of Personnel Management, said that in four or five years there would be little or no difference in the family and self-plus one plans.

Some experts say that as more older workers and retirees move into self-plus-one plans, the day could come when they will pay slightly higher premiums than those paid by the bigger, but younger and healthier people in family plans.

For a look at all the premium changes in all of the nationwide fee-for-service plans covering most non-postal workers and retirees, — and you can compare rates for 2018 and 2019 as well as look at the self-only, family and self-plus one plan premiums — take a look at the charts released by the Office of Management and Budget: <a href="https://federalnewsradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Non-Postal-Premium-Rates.pdf">Non-Postal Premium Rates Charts.</a>
<h2>Nearly Useless Factoid</h2>
<strong>By <a href="mailto:sthomas@federalnewsradio.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Steff Thomas</a></strong>

In 1883, the City of New York passed a Tariff Act that placed a special tax on imported vegetables. The John Nix & Co. company filed a lawsuit against Edward Hedden, a collector on the port of New York, to recover back-taxes paid under protest. The suit went all the way to the Supreme Court. It was in the Supreme Court hearing <i>Nix v. Hedden </i>that the tomato was re-classified as a vegetable, and not a fruit.

<i>Source: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_v._Hedden" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Wikipedia</a></i>

Your Turn

Are you in the wrong health plan?

David Snell, director, federal benefits service department, NARFE

All News

David Snell: OPM data breach raises more questions than answers

Mike Causey

Answers to your retirement questions

Mike Causey

Answers to your questions about survival benefits

Management

Online Chat: Ask the Benefits Expert

Benefits

TSP scores high, flexible spending low in latest federal employee benefits survey

Mike Causey

Medicare Part B: The $1,200 question

Mike Causey

Rush hour or sleep late? Your call!

Mike Causey

Belt & suspenders: The $1,200 question

Budget

Under budget deal squeeze, will future feds opt out of TSP?

Mike Causey

FEHBP, Medicare & the retiree blues

Mike Causey

Best buys during Open Season

Mike Causey

Survive Open Season and save a thousand bucks!

Federal Acquisition, GSA

Mike Causey

Self plus one, chained CPI, & COLAs