Management
The Supreme Court strips the SEC of a critical enforcement tool in fraud cases
Commentary
Responding in harmony: Cyber reporting as a team sport
Of Consuming Interest
Using natural disasters to defraud consumers
Of Consuming Interest
How to invest without being defrauded
Tom Temin Commentary
Ironic: Commission on public service to release ideas during shutdown
TSP
5 questions about TSP's new withdrawal options, answered
TSP
SEC, TSP will hold training for retirement-ready federal employees
Of Consuming Interest
The dangers of dabbling in cryptocurrency
Women of Washington
Like people, regulation doesn't always fit inside a box
Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.)/ AP photo/Carolyn Kaster
![WASHINGTON (AP) — <a href="https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court">The Supreme Court</a> on Thursday stripped <a href="https://apnews.com/hub/us-securities-and-exchange-commission">the Securities and Exchange Commission</a> of a major tool in fighting securities fraud in a decision that also could have far-reaching effects on other regulatory agencies.
<a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24779202-sec-v-jarkesy">The justices ruled</a> in a 6-3 vote that people accused of fraud by the SEC, which regulates securities markets, have the right to a jury trial in federal court. The in-house proceedings the SEC has used in some civil fraud complaints, including against Houston hedge fund manager George Jarkesy, violate the Constitution, the court said.
“A defendant facing a fraud suit has the right to be tried by a jury of his peers before a neutral adjudicator,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court's conservative majority.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who read from her dissent in the courtroom, said that “litigants who seek to dismantle the administrative state” would rejoice in the decision.
Federal agencies that oversee safety in mines and other workplaces are among many that can only impose civil penalties in in-house, administrative proceedings, Sotomayor wrote, joined by Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan.
“For those and countless other agencies, all the majority can say is tough luck; get a new statute from Congress,” she wrote.
The case is among <a href="https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-chevron-government-regulations-9acb83915166d3bc7439dd4ae74af8a9">several this term</a> in which conservative and business interests are urging the nine-member court to constrict federal regulators. The court’s six conservatives already have done so, including in <a href="https://apnews.com/article/wetlands-business-climate-and-environment-washington-news-41fc297006512e1f507dc12daa44824a">a decision last year</a> that sharply limited environmental regulators’ ability to police water pollution in wetlands.
Still awaiting decision are cases calling on the court to overturn the 40-year-old ruling colloquially known as Chevron, which has made it easier to sustain regulation of the environment, public, health, worker safety and consumer protection. Some of the same parties that supported Jarkesy at the Supreme Court are calling for Chevron to be overturned.
The SEC was awarded more than $5 billion in civil penalties in the 2023 government spending year that ended Sept. 30, the agency said in a news release. It was unclear how much of that money came through in-house proceedings or lawsuits in federal court.
The agency had already reduced the number of cases it brings in administrative proceedings pending the Supreme Court's resolution of the case.
The high court rejected arguments advanced by President Joe Biden's Democratic administration that relied on a 50-year-old decision in which the court ruled that in-house proceedings did not violate the Constitution’s right to a jury trial in civil lawsuits.
The justices ruled in favor of Jarkesy after the SEC appealed a decision in which the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals <a href="https://apnews.com/article/congress-new-orleans-government-and-politics-executive-branch-a6a6c0e83238d0e5e55aedd9eb0ab85f">threw out stiff financial penalties</a> against Jarkesy and his Patriot28 investment adviser.
The appeals court found that the SEC’s case against Jarkesy, resulting in a $300,000 civil fine and the repayment of $680,000 in allegedly ill-gotten gains, should have been heard in a federal court instead of before one of the SEC’s administrative law judges.
Jarkesy’s lawyers noted that the SEC wins almost all the cases it brings in front of the administrative law judges but only about 60% of cases tried in federal court.
The appeals court also said Congress unconstitutionally granted the SEC “unfettered authority” to decide whether the case should be tried in a court of law or handled within the executive branch agency. And it said laws shielding the commission’s administrative law judges from being fired by the president are unconstitutional.
Those issues got virtually no attention during <a href="https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-regulatory-agencies-sec-enforcement-c3a3cae2f4bc5f53dd6a23e99d3a1fac">arguments in November</a>, and the court chose to resolve the case only on the right to a jury trial.
___
Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at <a href="https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court">https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court</a>.]()
Federal Newscast
Bipartisan bill calls for giving 'non-critical sensitive' defense workers due process
Federal Newscast
Acting IGs can be just as effective as permanent leaders
Federal Newscast
Deadline set for Navy's move to Windows 10
Federal Newscast
House Dems want to broaden investigation into fake comments
Cybersecurity
SEC's burgeoning cyber unit taking securities fraud by storm
Of Consuming Interest
Crowdfunding: the good and the bad -12/24/17
Workforce
6 things agencies did to improve employee engagement this year
Federal Drive
Marty Vanderploeg: Security update on SEC's data standard
Workforce
Exclusive Why the transition didn't stop the SEC from improving employee engagement for a 5th year
Federal Drive
Greg Wilshusen: SEC continues to battle cybersecurity issues
Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Jay Clayton/AP
Tom Temin Commentary
Your head could roll in next cyber breach
Cybersecurity
SEC chairman: 'We want and need' IT modernization fund Trump admin wants to eliminate
TSP
SEC warns of yet another scam targeting TSP participants
