Much of the focus and attention to artificial intelligence comes down to the algorithms associated with it. The accuracy of the AI depends on the data feeding it.

Michael Anderson
Chief Strategist, Public Sector, Informatica
Hubbard Radio Washington DC, LLC. All rights reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
Much of the focus and attention to artificial intelligence comes down to the algorithms associated with it. The accuracy of the AI depends on the data feeding it.
Chief Strategist, Public Sector, Informatica
In the 21st century, many people say data is the new gold, which is why the government is investing in getting its data organized and outlining a strategy for its future use.
Informatica Chief Public Sector Strategist Mike Anderson says the government needs to maintain a “trinity” around data to keep information flowing and to feed technologies like artificial intelligence that will keep the United States’ technological edge, but that is reliant on the government’s data strategy.
That trinity is a set of interlocking advancements: AI, cloud and data itself.
AI needs clean, reliable data to work in an ethical, precise and progressive way.
“Much of the focus and attention to artificial intelligence comes down to the algorithms associated with it,” Anderson said. “The accuracy of the AI depends on the data feeding it.”
And, of course, that data needs to be safe and accessible to AI by some sort of cloud.
“It takes massive amounts of data to train an algorithm to actually come up with some type of level of intelligence that will automate processes,” Anderson said. “The only way to do that is to feed the algorithm massive amounts of data. You can only do that efficiently and effectively in a cloud type of environment.”
The government is banking on AI as a game changer for everything from business processes to warfare and it’s making investments to show that.
But, how can the United States keep improving its data for algorithms to use, and therefore make AI more advanced?
The Federal Data Strategy was created to leverage the value of data for mission service and public good. While it’s made some strides in the past year, Anderson says there is more that can be done going forward to keep improving the government’s use of data.
“This year is a tremendous opportunity, because we’ve learned a lot of lessons from COVID-19 in terms of what data can do to drive good policy decisions that affect the economy and all of our lives,” Anderson said. “There’s two focus areas that are going to be pretty important moving forward and to build upon the year one action plan.”
The first is data governance.
“Freedom really comes from ensuring data governance is available across agencies,” Anderson said. “It starts at the Office of Management and Budget, which had a task essentially from the act, to make sure that they were able to apply policies, establish a common interoperability of data and to make sure that those policies could be monitored from a data privacy standpoint.”
Anderson said governance is about setting up a framework that offers freedom to consumers so they can get the job done. At this point, governance should be automated.
Knowing where your data is, how it’s collected, how it’s cataloged, that you can trust it, who are the owners of that data, who’s responsible for what, and then making sure it can be shared across an organization and it’s trusted are all important parts of making data-hungry products work.
The strategy also needs proper funding to move the data strategy further.
Anderson said deploying metrics on how the strategy is evolving will help drive a reliable budget.
“OMB could take a look at this with their Chief Data Officer Council and their own data governance board in developing a set of metrics and scorecards for agencies on the completion of the actions and tasks in the yearly action plans,” Anderson said. “Making that scorecard public will also drive all of the agencies leadership to pay attention to what’s especially important with the transition of the administration today, and also driving the need for identifying that budget requirement to really get this on steroids and move out.”
Chief Strategist, Public Sector, Informatica
Defense Reporter, Federal News Network
Chief Strategist, Public Sector, Informatica
Michael R. Anderson serves as the Chief Strategist of Public Sector at Informatica, Llc. In this role he leads strategic activities for Informatica with a focus on enterprise data management and data security software capabilities supporting the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Federal agencies. Mike previously worked as the Director, Federal Strategy and Plans for RSA, a Dell Company, and held the position of Manager, Strategic Programs for the Federal Division of Dell-EMC.
Mike is a retired U.S. Army Colonel with 30+ years of national security and federal government experience leading organizations, developing business processes, building operational procedures, and creating strategic plans and policies for both start-up and established enterprises. His experience includes several overseas operations, service in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Army Staff and the Joint Staff. His military career culminated with duty at U.S. Army Cyber Command as the Chief of Plans, Policy, Strategy (G5). Mike holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Florida and a Bachelor of Arts degree from American University.
Defense Reporter, Federal News Network
Scott Maucione is a defense reporter for Federal News Network and has worked in journalism for over a decade. He previously covered the Pentagon for Inside Defense. He received his B.A. in journalism and political science from the University of Maryland and his Master’s from American University in applied politics.