By Michael O’Connell
Federal News Radio
& Lolita C. Baldor
A day without pay, the first of 11 through September, arrives today for more than 650,000 people who hold civilian jobs with the Defense Department. Officials worry that the Pentagon will be hit even harder by layoffs in 2014 if automatic budget cuts continue as planned.
Roughly 85 percent of the department’s nearly 900,000 civilians around the world will be furloughed one day each week over the next three months, according to the latest statistics provided by the Pentagon. But while defense officials were able to shift money around to limit the furloughs this year, thousands of civilian, military and contract jobs could be on the chopping block next year.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is expected to provide senators with more details early next week on how the next wave of across-the-board budget cuts will affect the department, said Pentagon press secretary George Little. But while defense officials have not yet released details on the impact of the cuts, Gen. Ray Odierno, the Army’s chief of staff, has warned that as many as 100,000 more active-duty, National Guard and Reserve soldiers could lose their jobs if Congress allows billions of dollars in automatic budget cuts to continue next year.
Insight by Sonatype: Stephan Mitchev, acting CTO at USPTO, discusses how USPTO is looking at supply chain issues to address cybersecurity concerns. Dr. Stephen Magill, VP of product innovation at Sonatype, provides an industry perspective.
Initial hopes that the number of furlough days could be reduced have largely been dashed. Instead, talk is focused more on how to slash spending in 2014. The department can only force workers to take 22 furlough days per year, thus the need for possible layoffs.
In the coming weeks, however, civilian employees ranging from top-level policy advisers to school teachers and depot workers will not be answering their phones or responding to emails for one day a week through the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30. The department estimates the savings will be between $1.9 billion and $2.1 billion.
Managers across the department have been given some flexibility in how they schedule the days off during each two-week pay period. But they also are dealing with complex legal requirements that in many cases prevent them from using military personnel to fill in for the absent civilians.
“There’s going to be perhaps some degradation of mission across the department, and because of reduced work schedules for 650,000 employees,” Little said. “We knew that going in, and we knew that would be a problem, and we’ve tried to take steps to ensure that top-priority missions across the department aren’t disproportionately affected.
Government employees share ups and downs of furlough days
Federal News Radio asked its readers on Facebook to share their strategies for surviving the furloughs.
Some furloughed employees, like Cheryl Lowery, are trying to make the best out of a bad situation. Lowery wrote she would be enjoying “dates with my grandchildren, lounging by the pool, camping and more fun stuff.”
Likewise, Alana Casanova Johnson will be taking field trips with her children and opting for low-cost activities like visiting the National Zoo.
“Furlough days will be go back to sleep days after waking up early and realizing it’s not a work day,” wrote Tanya Ramey, a DoD writer/editor. “[I] will enjoy days off, even though I won’t enjoy reduced pay, but grateful I have a job. Just hope one day feds won’t be the target to such cuts.”
Government contractor Kendra Brewington’s furlough experience hasn’t been that rosy. She’s endured a seven-week long, temporarily layoff, as she waits for a task order from a newly awarded contract to come through.
“The first week I lounged and ran errands,” Brewington wrote on Facebook. “The second week I vowed to start my new fitness plan that never came to fruition. Week 3, I wondered how long I could live off of my savings. Week 4, I started job hunting and haven’t looked back since. Either the contract will come through first or I’ll receive a new offer soon.”
In some cases, supervisors will try to accommodate workers who manage to find some other part-time, temporary job to help ease the fiscal pain, although they are limited in the types of employment they can take.
Chuck McCoy wrote he was working part-time to compensate for the loss of income and had restructured his vacation into a “stay-cation.”
Dennis Burke, who works for the Army, and Christine Farrell Page are seeking part- time jobs, as is Scott Dingwall, who added he was eating ramen to help “avoid bankruptcy.”
Some furloughed workers don’t have option for part-time work
Civilians have been getting their furlough letters sporadically for the last few weeks. The letters tell them that during their furlough time, “you will not be permitted to serve as an unpaid volunteer, must remain away from your workplace, and are prohibited from performing any work-related duties.”
Civilians can appeal the furloughs once they have actually taken one of the unpaid days off.
The monetary impact for individuals varies widely, depending on salaries. But workers will effectively receive a 20 percent salary cut each pay period for the rest of the fiscal year. For a civilian making roughly $100,000 a year, that will mean about $1,600 in lost pay each month. Someone making $40,000 a year would get $600 less a month. Health care and other paycheck deductions would not decrease.
The impact also varies dramatically in military installations and defense offices around the world, from the massive five-sided office building near the Potomac River to smaller work places in Guam or Cyprus. Vermont has the fewest Defense Department civilians on furlough, with about 490, while Virginia easily has the most with nearly 72,000. For the most part, the number of furloughed civilians in other countries ranges from a handful to several dozen, but in Germany — where U.S. Africa Command and U.S. European Command are based — the number exceeds 13,000.
The situation in Germany has triggered complaints, including a letter from Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C., asking Hagel to halt a pay raise for German civilians working at the U.S. bases in that country. Noting that more than 19,000 civilian workers in North Carolina will be furloughed — for a total loss in pay of about $64 million — she said Hagel should stop the $16 million in pay hikes for the German workers during 2013-14.
Under a union agreement, the German workers will get a one-time payment of 500 euros and a 30 euro-a-month pay increase beginning in January.
According to Army spokesman Paul Prince, the raise does not exceed 1 percent, which is similar to what the president proposed for federal workers.
Federal News Radio reader Terisa Ashofteh Waterman wrote that without the option for part-time work, overseas workers are “just out of luck for trying to supplement in any way.”
Waterman added it was sad that Congress wasn’t sharing in the burden of reduced pay federal employees were experiencing due to sequestration and furloughs. “They should not be paid until they do their job and do it properly verses punishing us for doing our jobs,” she wrote.
A bit more than 240,000 defense department civilians are exempt from the furloughs, with the bulk of those being foreign nationals or workers not paid through appropriated funding. Nearly 7,000 defense intelligence workers are exempt, along with about 29,000 workers at Navy shipyards, where officials worried that the harm to shop maintenance would end up costing more than the salary cuts would save.
Congress has set in motion about $500 billion in across-the-board budget cuts over 10 years, forcing the Pentagon to come up with wide-ranging plans for closing bases, raising health care fees and smaller pay raises. But Congress’ adamant opposition to base closures will mean the department will have to find savings elsewhere.
The Obama administration has proposed a base budget of $526.6 billion for 2014 for the Pentagon, about $52 billion more than the $475 billion level established by the spending cuts set in the 2011 budget agreement between Obama and congressional Republicans.