Studies ‘prove’ feds are either overpaid or underpaid

What would happen if you put six people in a dark room with an elephant, a rhino and a giant squid and gave them 30 seconds to describe what they discovered? Od...

What would happen if you put six intelligent men and women in a pitch black room with a large elephant, a rhino, a moose and a giant squid, and they were given only 30 seconds to come up with a complete description of whatever they discovered?

Chances are, those who survived groping an elephant or rhino would have widely differing descriptions. Their reports might be accurate, up to a point. They would be based on what part of the animals (or their human colleagues) they touched during the brief expedition. Depending on where they went, the elephant could be described as snake-like, a tree or a very rough barrel. The moose could be a giant hat rack. And so on.

That, in more scientific terms, is what the Government Accountability Office says about the various studies, reports and rants about whether federal workers are overpaid or underpaid compared to their counterparts in the private sector.

Conservative think tanks looked at pay and said, in effect, that any way you hack it feds have it made. That they are better paid while working, and are among the nation’s senior elite because of their indexed-to-inflation pensions — as opposed to most American workers who have no pensions to be indexed.

Pro-government groups point out that the federal workforce is highly professional — as in, it doesn’t do retail — so higher group pay rates, at all but the top levels, are misleading. Workers at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or at NASA’s Goddard office probably make a lot more than the collective crew at your nearest Wal-Mart.

A popular-with-the-press study by the conservative Cato Institute showed that feds earned as much as 58 percent more (in pay and benefits) than private sector workers. The Presidents Pay Agents — an advisory group whose advice is rarely taken — says civil servants are underpaid an average of 28 percent compared to nonfeds doing the same jobs. The Congressional Budget Office, with a just-the-facts-ma’am reputation, puts feds ahead by a mere 2 percent.

So the GAO studied the studies. Its in-a-nutshell conclusion is: “The numerous formulas utilized in human capital and job-to-job comparisons often lead to very different results.”

On yesterday’s Your Turn radio show, economist Jacque Simon, from the American Federation of Government Employees union, said the studies showing feds as fatcats are flawed because, among other things, they don’t take into account the fact that women in the private sector are often paid less than men doing the same jobs. To hear the rest of her interview, click here.

Check out the GAO study for yourself. Balanced as it is, chances are the debate is not over and that both sides will proceed, full steam ahead, trying to prove the other guy is wrong.


By Jack Moore

If you plan on watching the Olympics in the next few weeks, be forewarned. Not all the sounds you hear are entirely accurate. The producers of the Olympics broadcast will use “artificial sweeteners,” Slate reports. For example, during rowing events, the sound of oars dipping into the water are all pre-recorded and played back during the live broadcast. says it’s a common occurrence during televised sports events. For example, during horse races, the sound of horse hooves furiously pounding the track is pre-recorded and the sound is actually that of a “slowed-down buffalo charge.”


GAO, FPS disagree over ability to assess federal building risk
The Modified Infrastructure Survey Tool does not provide information about the consequences of security incidents at federal facilities, a GAO auditor said.

State’s lack of middle managers risks diplomacy
Looming budget cuts and the opening of new embassies in Iraq and Afghanistan have wiped out the State Department’s supply of middle managers.

Inspector General: SSA sitting on $133 million in uncashed checks
The federal government has made it a top priority to reduce the rate of improper payments that needlessly drain agency coffers. But a new report indicates at least one agency has the opposite problem: Holding on to payments that should be disbursed to eligible recipients.

Copyright © 2024 Federal News Network. All rights reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.