In a follow-up to President Donald Trump’s executive order on artificial intelligence, the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy has released what it has described as a “first of its kind” set of principles that agencies must meet when drafting AI regulations.
Other agencies have spent considerable effort pinning down ethical AI use over the past year. The defense and national security communities, for example, recently mapped out their own ethical considerations for AI, and the United States last spring signed off on a common set of international AI principles with more than 40 other countries.
Insight by ThunderCat Technology and Dell Technologies: Learn different ways agencies are taking more advantage of AI and ML tools to help exceed mission expectations by downloading this exclusive e-book.
U.S. Chief Technology Officer Michael Kratsios said agencies must demonstrate to the White House that they’ve met all 10 of its AI principles when proposing rules governing the private sector’s deployment of AI technology. These principles, he said, demonstrate the Trump administration’s commitment to “maintain and strengthen the U.S. position of leadership” on AI.
“The U.S. AI regulatory principles provide official guidance and reduce uncertainty for innovators about how the federal government is approaching the regulation of artificial intelligence technologies,” Kratsios said. “By providing this regulatory clarity, our intent is to remove impediments to private-sector AI innovation and growth. Removing obstacles to the development of AI means delivering the promise of this technology for all Americans, from advancements in health care, transportation, communication — innovations we haven’t even thought of yet.”
The public will have 60 days to comment on the White House’s draft guidance. Following those 60 days, the White House will issue a final memorandum to federal agencies and instruct agencies to submit implementation plans.
Deputy U.S. Chief Technology Officer Lynne Parker said these agency implementation plans will cover a wide swath of policy issues and will help avoid a “one-size-fits-all” approach to regulating AI.
The White House policy would, for example, come into effect when the Department of Transportation sets rules for AI-enabled drones, or the Food and Drug Administration approves AI-powered medical devices. However, Parker clarified that the government’s use of AI remains “outside the purview” of this document.
“While there are ongoing policy discussions about the use of AI by the government, this action in particular though addresses the use of AI in the private sector,” Parker said. “It’s also important to note that these principles are intentionally high-level. Federal agencies will implement the guidance in accordance with their sector-specific needs. We purposefully want to avoid top-down, one-size-fits-all blanket regulation, as AI-powered technologies reach across vastly different industries.”
Parker outlined OSTP’s 10 AI principles:
Parker said agencies should also consider non-regulatory oversight of AI, including pilot programs, and reducing the barrier to AI development by releasing more federal data sets publicly.
OSTP’s AI principles meet some of the goals of the American AI Initiative that Trump created through an executive order last February. That executive order mandated that the administration develop a national action plan to “protect the advantage” of the U.S. in AI research and development.
Other agencies have already made progress toward the administration’s AI goals. The National Institute of Standards and Technology, in developing technical standards for AI use, has proposed that agencies set ground rules for AI ethics without “stifling innovation.”
Administration officials said state or local governments banning the use of facial-recognition AI tools, for example, sets too much of a regulatory burden.
“When particular states or localities make decisions like banning facial recognition across the board, you end up in tricky situations where civil servants may be breaking the law when they try to unlock their government-issued phone,” an administration official said. “We want to avoid situations where we’re outright banning new technologies and rather creating a robust regulatory framework, which allows these technologies to thrive in our country.”
The Defense Innovation Board and the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence have also released their own recommendations for ethical AI use. The former panel has sent its non-binding proposals to Defense Secretary Mark Esper for consideration, while the latter group will submit its final recommendations to Congress later this year.
NSCAI chairmen Eric Schmidt, the former CEO of Google and its parent company Alphabet, and former Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work, told reporters back in November that the U.S.’s role as the top authority on AI research could be in jeopardy, with rivals like China gaining momentum in certain key areas.
Want to stay up to date with the latest federal news and information from all your devices? Download the revamped Federal News Network app
Meanwhile, Kratsios said the Trump administration encourages the European Commission, which will release its own AI regulatory document in the coming months, to use this OSTP policy as a framework.
Meanwhile, an administration official said the White House’s AI principles will serve as an example for other Western countries.
“The West needs to lead the world in next-generation technological development because if we do not, some of the other players around the world will be attempting to insert their values into these next-generation technologies, and it is more imperative than ever before for the United States and the West to make the next great technological breakthroughs,” the official said.