The National Institute of Health’s Information Technology Acquisition and Assessment Center (NITAAC) has about two years to award its next great governmentwide acquisition contract called CIO-SP4.
While this may seem like a lot of time, NITAAC already is getting comments back on its draft solicitation.
Keith Johnson, the contracting lead for the CIO-SP3 and CIO-SP4 vehicles for NITAAC, said industry feedback was due back to his organization by May 15 and he expects the final solicitation for the $40 billion IT products and services GWAC to be more responsive to small businesses and agency customers alike.
Insight by RSA: Leaders in innovation examine identity and access management tactics in this exclusive executive briefing.
“The draft has a direction in terms of some items that we would like to change, but all of that is preliminary,” Johnson said in an interview with Federal News Network. “For example, we would like to go to one GWAC. Currently we have a small business GWAC and an unrestricted GWAC, and the scope of both of those contracts mirror each other. There are a number of reasons why we would like to do that. Most notably, as a benefit to our small business owners.”
Johnson said another change is around the scope of the contract to address new and modern technologies and processes.
A third change is with the potential move to one GWAC, NITAAC wants to make it possible to set-aside task orders for small businesses and specifically for socioeconomic categories. Johnson said the goal is to add more socioeconomic categories such as women-owned businesses and Native American and Alaska Native owned firms.
The current GWAC, CIO-SP3, expires in May 2022 and both the unrestricted and small business contracts have a ceiling of $20 billion each. There are 52 vendors on the unrestricted vehicle and 358 on the small business version. Bloomberg Government’s analysis of the both GWACs show how popular they have been among agencies and vendors. BGov reported agencies spent more than $8 billion on CIO-SP3 unrestricted and $6.7 billion on the small business version since 2016.
The departments of Health and Human Services and Defense have been the biggest users of both versions of the CIO-SP3 over the last four-plus years.
The popularity of the both contracts is why Johnson has been aggressively seeking feedback on the changes NITAAC is proposing.
“We are just soliciting feedback from industry. That is very important part of this process. We may not go in a certain direction if we receive a good reason not to from industry,” he said. “We plan to go through the comments and deliberate on what we plan to do moving forward. There is some talk of releasing another draft RFP. The current draft speaks a lot about self-scoring, but we haven’t released self-scoring template or sheet for industry to chew on. There is some talk of releasing a draft self-scoring sheet. We are still deliberating that.”
Contractors are most interested in the preliminary decision by NITAAC to move CIO-SP4 to one GWAC instead of two. Johnson said there are several reasons for this proposed change.
“The scope of the two GWACs are identical. What we have witnessed throughout the performance of the contract, when an agency decides to use NITAAC, the contracting officer at the task order level may decide to use the unrestricted GWAC, for whatever reason. It’s their decision. We’ve noticed the unrestricted GWAC has a higher award amount. But the scope is the same as the small business GWAC. So when a requirement is placed against the unrestricted GWAC, the small business contract holders can’t see or participate in that opportunity,” he said. “So the thought is, if we combine the two, it would, in fact, give small businesses the opportunity at least to see and compete for those requirements that otherwise would’ve gone to the unrestricted GWAC.”
Johnson said small businesses could bid on many of the task orders under the CIO-SP3 unrestricted GWAC, but don’t have the opportunity.
“There is no reason, at least in my mind, for a contracting officer not to set a requirement aside. If the small businesses and other than small businesses on this one GWAC have the same capabilities, so there is no reason not to set-aside the requirement,” he said. “What we have now is what I’ve unofficially coined as almost a set-aside for large businesses. So with a one GWAC approach is actually an upgrade and the contract is getting more attuned for our small business partners.”
Johnson said he wants to make sure small firms know NITAAC is not turning its back on them, but actually opening the door to more opportunities.
Johnson said NITAAC expects to release the final solicitation in late November or early December with responses due three or so months after that. He said the award timeline will depend on how many proposals they receive as NITAAC expects a lot of interest from vendors.