The refrain is familiar. Someone said it the other night at the Service to America medals ceremonies. Only a small percentage of the federal workforce is under 35 years old. Still tinier is the fraction under 30.
Yet untold numbers of younger workers are working for the government. They’re just not on the government payroll. They work for contractors, and they’re doing important and difficult work.
I have only anecdotal evidence and no numbers. But I think I’m right. This group may not join the ranks of policy or program analysts, contracting officers or contract auditors, but their work is directly on behalf of the government.
My anecdotes come from a weekend visit to my alma mater, the Rochester Institute of Technology. I sat on a panel of former school paper editors. RIT, once a regional training ground for printers, photographers, graphic artists and engineers, has become a world class center for a diverse set of fields including cybersecurity, imaging sciences, computer sciences, and environmental sustainability. It has maker spaces, start-up incubator centers, and additive manufacturing labs. Students graduate with useful skills — skills in demand by industry and government.
Here are two examples of what I started talking about:
For homecoming weekend, a little waist-high booth stood in the middle of the campus. There a student, Brandon, handed out programs for the day’s activities. I asked Brandon what he majors in: Cybersecurity. I said, well there’s plenty of government work there.
“That’s what I’m doing,” Brandon replied. He said we was working for Parsons Corporation under RIT’s co-op program. I know them, I said. They have a big building in Washington near the ballpark. “That’s where I work!” Brandon beamed.
I didn’t pester him on details, but he said he works for several federal agencies. Indeed, at its web site Parsons specifically states it’s hiring people in cybersecurity. It lists as its primary markets defense and intelligence. So there’s one young person doing federal work who doesn’t show up in the official counts.
Later in the morning I wandered into a brunch of the imaging sciences program. Still a student at heart, I thought, why not get a free breakfast? Besides, I majored in photography — that’s imaging.
There I chatted with Dan, a 2015 graduate. He’s working for Lockheed, developing imaging systems for the Navy’s submarines. Forget that old idea of the periscope with a lens on the front, a mirror on the bottom and a tube going through the hull of the boat. It’s all electronic imaging over fiber cabling now. No need for the periscope apparatus to have a hole through the tower.
What of those who want to go to work directly for the government? You know that story. I spoke with a faculty adviser. She moonlights helping college students and younger employees looking to change companies with resume preparation. She described one example of a data analyst at an insurance company who was accepted into a job in the intelligence community. Security clearance took a year. The employee, in her early 30s, did non-classified work for a while, and waited in limbo for consummation of the hire. She said this dreary phenomenon is well-known throughout academia, even as federal agencies actively recruit on campuses.
I ran my theory past a NASA executive at this week’s Imagine Nation ELC 2019 in Philadelphia, hosted by the American Council for Technology and Industry Advisory Council, or ACT-IAC. She said she gets a lot of queries from young people interested in federal work. She said she routinely refers them to the long list of NASA contractors.
To a programatically, but statistically insignificant degree, the 18F program at the General Services Administration and the U.S. Digital Service have brought under-35 and under-30 people into government. But the real numbers are out there in the contractors.